CVE-2025-1013
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA race condition could have led to private browsing tabs being opened in normal browsing windows. This could have resulted in a potential privacy leak. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 135, Firefox ESR 128.7, Thunderbird 128.7, and Thunderbird 135.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a race condition vulnerability in Firefox and Thunderbird where private browsing tabs could incorrectly be opened in normal browsing windows instead of in an isolated private browsing context. Due to the timing issue, the privacy protections of private browsing mode (no history, no cookies, etc.) could be bypassed, potentially leaking private browsing activity to normal browser history or persistence layers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 128.7.0< 135.0< 128.7.0>= 129.0, < 135.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Firefox versionIn Firefox, go to Menu > Help > About Firefox, or navigate to about:support. Locate the 'Version' field.Affected if Version is below 128.7.0 or below 135.0 (for example, 128.6.x, 134.x, etc.)
-
Check installed Thunderbird versionIn Thunderbird, go to Menu > Help > About Thunderbird. Locate the 'Version' field.Affected if Version is below 128.7.0, or is 129.0 through 134.x inclusive.
-
Determine if private browsing feature is usedCheck whether any user profiles on this installation have ever used Private Browsing mode (Ctrl+Shift+P / Cmd+Shift+P in Firefox, or equivalent). Inspect recent browsing history for entries that should not exist if private browsing worked correctly.Affected if Private browsing mode was used on affected versions - the vulnerability allows private browsing history to leak into normal history.
-
Inspect browsing history for anomaliesOpen the Firefox Library > History panel (Ctrl+H / Cmd+Y). Search for URLs that should not appear if private browsing was functioning correctly - these would be visits that occurred during private sessions but are now visible in normal history.Affected if Private browsing URLs appear in normal browser history, indicating the vulnerability was triggered.
A user is affected if they run Firefox below 128.7.0 or below 135.0 (or Thunderbird in the specified vulnerable ranges) AND have used private browsing mode, with private session history incorrectly appearing in normal history.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped128.7.0135.0
Upgrade to Firefox 135, Firefox ESR 128.7, Thunderbird 128.7, or Thunderbird 135 to obtain the patched version. Alternatively, avoid using private browsing mode until the update is applied.
Firefox 135 (or Firefox ESR 128.7); Thunderbird 135 (or Thunderbird 128.7)
- 1. Check current Firefox version by navigating to about:support or going to Help > About Firefox
- 2. Check current Thunderbird version by navigating to Help > About Thunderbird
- 3. For Firefox: Download Firefox 135 from mozilla.org or click 'Refresh Firefox' in about:support to get the latest version
- 4. For Thunderbird: Download Thunderbird 135 (or 128.7 for extended support) from mozilla.org
- 5. Restart the application after installation completes
- 6. For Enterprise deployments using Firefox ESR: Deploy Firefox ESR 128.7 as per organizational patching schedule
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1013 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1013 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data