UpdfApplication

CVE-2025-10213

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
DLL search path hijacking vulnerability in the UPDF.exe executable for Windows version 1.8.5.0 allows attackers with local access to execute arbitrary code by placing a dxtn.dll file of their choice in the 'C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\' directory, which could lead to arbitrary code execution and persistence.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

DLL search path hijacking vulnerability in UPDF.exe version 1.8.5.0 allows local attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by placing a malicious dxtn.dll file in the user-writable WindowsApps directory (C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\). The application loads this DLL without a fully qualified path, causing it to be found before legitimate system DLLs.

MitigationRestrict write permissions on the WindowsApps directory to prevent unauthorized DLL placement, conduct forensic analysis for existing malicious dxtn.dll files, and monitor for vendor patch release.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
UpdfApplication
Affected:= 1.8.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed UPDF version
    Open Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or the UPDF application, right-click and select Properties, or right-click the UPDF.exe file and view Properties > Details to find the version number
    Affected if Version displayed is exactly 1.8.5.0
  2. Locate the UPDF.exe binary
    Search for UPDF.exe using File Explorer search or by running 'where /r C:\ UPDF.exe' in Command Prompt. Common paths include C:\Program Files\UPDF\ or C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Programs\UPDF\
    Affected if UPDF.exe exists on the system at any location
  3. Verify WindowsApps directory is user-writable
    Open Command Prompt and run 'icacls "C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"' replacing <username> with your account name
    Affected if Your user account has Write or Write+Delete permissions (D:(D,WDAC)) on this directory
  4. Check for suspicious dxtn.dll in WindowsApps
    Navigate to C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\ in File Explorer or run 'dir "C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\dxtn.dll"'
    Affected if A dxtn.dll file exists in this directory (this file is not normally present in this location)
  5. Audit recent DLL loading behavior
    Use Sysinternals Process Monitor (procmon.exe) with filter "Path contains dxtn.dll" while launching UPDF.exe, or check Windows Event Viewer Application logs for DLL load warnings
    Affected if UPDF.exe attempts to load dxtn.dll from the WindowsApps directory or any non-system path

You are affected if UPDF version 1.8.5.0 is installed AND the WindowsApps directory is writable (default) AND a dxtn.dll file exists in that directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict write permissions on the WindowsApps directory to prevent unauthorized DLL placement, conduct forensic analysis for existing malicious dxtn.dll files, and monitor for vendor patch release.

Fix this in Updf Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10213 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data