CVE-2025-10266
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNUP Pro developed by NewType Infortech has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNUP Pro by NewType Infortech contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands. The flaw permits reading, modifying, and deleting database contents without any authentication credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NUP Pro installationSearch for NUP Pro files, services, or web application directories on the system. Look for processes named 'NUP' or 'NewType Infortech', and check installed programs list or web server document roots for NUP Pro components.Affected if NUP Pro by NewType Infortech is installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck for version information in NUP Pro installation directories, configuration files, about pages in the web interface, or any version.txt/version.xml files shipped with the product. Compare against any known version ranges if available.Affected if The installed version matches any affected version of NUP Pro (no specific version range provided)
-
Check web interface exposureReview network bindings, IIS/Apache/Nginx configurations, and firewall rules to determine if the NUP Pro web interface is accessible from external networks. Use 'netstat -an' or equivalent to list listening ports associated with NUP Pro.Affected if The NUP Pro web interface is listening on a public or internal network address accessible to untrusted users
-
Identify user input endpointsReview NUP Pro web application source code, configuration files, and URL routing to locate endpoints that accept user-supplied parameters such as search fields, login forms, ID parameters, or any data submitted to database queries.Affected if User input fields or URL parameters are processed without visible parameterized query implementation
-
Review database connectivity configurationExamine database connection configuration files (connection strings, config.xml, web.config, or similar) in the NUP Pro installation directory to identify how the application connects to the database and whether authentication is required.Affected if The application uses direct SQL query construction with user input rather than parameterized queries, enabling unauthenticated SQL injection
The environment is affected if NUP Pro by NewType Infortech is installed and its web interface or API endpoints are accessible to untrusted users without proper input sanitization for database queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemediate by implementing parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions and adding proper input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data fields.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10266 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10266 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data