CVE-2025-10267
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNUP Portal developed by NewType Infortech has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to directly upload files. If the attacker manages to bypass the file extension restrictions, they could upload a webshell and execute it on the server side.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNUP Portal by NewType Infortech lacks authentication on its file upload endpoint, allowing any remote attacker to upload files without credentials. If an attacker bypasses the existing file extension restrictions, they can upload a malicious webshell and achieve remote code execution on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm NUP Portal installationSearch the server for NUP Portal files or check running web services for 'NUP Portal' or 'NewType Infortech' in application headers or installed software listsAffected if NUP Portal by NewType Infortech is installed and running
-
Identify file upload endpointLocate the file upload functionality in the web application by reviewing application URLs, checking for common upload paths like /upload, /file/upload, or /api/upload in the application structureAffected if A file upload endpoint exists and is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
-
Test upload endpoint authenticationSend a request to the upload endpoint without providing any authentication credentials (cookies, tokens, or session headers) and observe whether the request is accepted or rejectedAffected if The upload endpoint accepts requests without requiring authentication
-
Check file extension validation configurationReview the application configuration files or upload handler code to determine what file extensions are allowed, and whether extension checking is the only validation methodAffected if File extension restrictions exist but no additional server-side validation (such as magic byte verification) is configured
-
Verify uploaded file storage locationCheck if uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible directory (such as /uploads, /files, or web root) that allows execution of uploaded contentAffected if Uploaded files are stored in a directory that serves executable file types
The environment is affected if NUP Portal is running and the file upload endpoint accepts unauthenticated requests, allowing remote upload of executable files to a web-accessible location.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on all file upload endpoints, combined with strict server-side file validation (not just extension checking) including magic byte verification and executable file type blocking.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10267 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10267 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data