CVE-2025-10277
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in YunaiV yudao-cloud up to 2025.09. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /crm/receivable/submit. The manipulation of the argument ID results in improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceYunaiV yudao-cloud up to version 2025.09 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the /crm/receivable/submit endpoint. The ID parameter is not properly validated for authorization, allowing authenticated users to potentially access or manipulate receivables they should not have access to. This can be exploited remotely by manipulating the ID argument.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025.09CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Yudao Cloud versionCheck your deployed yudao-cloud application version (typically found in pom.xml, build.gradle, application metadata, or system info page) and compare it to the affected range <= 2025.09Affected if The installed version is 2025.09 or earlier
-
Locate the vulnerable endpointVerify that the /crm/receivable/submit endpoint exists in your deployed application (check deployed WAR/JAR artifacts or API documentation)Affected if The endpoint is present in the application
-
Test ID parameter authorizationWith an authenticated user account, attempt to access /crm/receivable/submit using an ID of a receivable record belonging to a different user or tenantAffected if The request succeeds and returns data or performs an operation on a receivable the authenticated user should not have access to
-
Review API access controlsExamine the application's API security configuration or controller code for /crm/receivable/submit to verify whether authorization checks exist for the ID parameter before processingAffected if No explicit ownership or tenant validation is performed on the ID parameter before processing the request
You are affected if running Yudao Cloud version 2025.09 or earlier AND the /crm/receivable/submit endpoint permits access to receivables belonging to other users or tenants without proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on the /crm/receivable/submit endpoint, validating that the authenticated user has permission to access the specific receivable record identified by the ID parameter before processing any operations.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10277 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10277 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data