CVE-2025-10327
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in MiczFlor RPi-Jukebox-RFID up to 2.8.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /htdocs/api/playlist/shuffle.php. Executing manipulation of the argument playlist can lead to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical OS command injection vulnerability exists in the RPi-Jukebox-RFID application (versions up to 2.8.0) in the /htdocs/api/playlist/shuffle.php endpoint. The 'playlist' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in system commands, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the RPi-Jukebox-RFID installation directorySearch for the 'htdocs' folder or the 'RPi-Jukebox-RFID' directory on the system. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /home/pi/RPi-Jukebox-RFID/, or the web server document root.Affected if The application directory exists on the system
-
Identify the installed versionCheck for a version file (VERSION, version.php, or similar) in the application root directory, or examine the git tags if it's a git repository. Compare the version number to the affected range (<=2.8.0).Affected if The installed version is 2.8.0 or lower, or no version file is found indicating an older installation
-
Verify the vulnerable shuffle.php file existsInspect the path /htdocs/api/playlist/shuffle.php within the application directory. Confirm the file is present.Affected if The file /htdocs/api/playlist/shuffle.php exists in the installation
-
Check for command injection vulnerability in the playlist parameterReview the shuffle.php source code and locate where the 'playlist' parameter is used in shell commands (e.g., exec(), shell_exec(), system(), passthru()). Look for direct insertion of the parameter into system calls without sanitization functions like escapeshellarg().Affected if The 'playlist' parameter is passed directly to PHP system functions without input validation or escaping
-
Determine if the web interface is exposedCheck the web server configuration (Apache, Nginx) to see if the /htdocs/api/ endpoint is accessible via network. Look for Allow/Deny directives or firewall rules.Affected if The /api/playlist/shuffle.php endpoint is accessible over the network (not localhost-only or firewalled)
The system is affected if RPi-Jukebox-RFID version 2.8.0 or lower is installed, the shuffle.php file exists, and the playlist parameter is used in system commands without sanitization, with the API endpoint network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUntil a vendor patch is available, implement input validation/sanitization on the playlist parameter in shuffle.php to prevent shell metacharacter injection, or restrict the application's permissions to limit command execution impact.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10327 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data