CVE-2025-10354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability reflected in Semantic MediaWiki. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute JavaScript code in the victim's browser by sending them a malicious URL using the '/index.php/Speciaal:GefacetteerdZoeken' endpoint parameter. This vulnerability can be exploited to steal sensitive user data, such as session cookies, or to perform actions on behalf of the user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceReflected XSS vulnerability in Semantic MediaWiki's faceted search endpoint ('/index.php/Speciaal:GefacetteerdZoeken'). User-supplied input in a URL parameter is reflected in the HTTP response without proper output encoding, allowing injection of arbitrary JavaScript that executes in victim's browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- A
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Semantic MediaWiki is installedCheck for the presence of the Semantic MediaWiki extension in your MediaWiki installation directory (typically in /extensions/SemanticMediaWiki or via composer). Alternatively, check the Special:Version page on your wiki.Affected if Semantic MediaWiki extension is present in the MediaWiki installation
-
Determine the installed Semantic MediaWiki versionVisit Special:Version on your wiki and locate the Semantic MediaWiki entry, or check the composer.json file in the extension directory for the version number.Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version (the vendor has not specified an exact version range; compare to the latest patched release)
-
Verify the faceted search endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the URL path '/index.php/Special:FacetedSearch' or the Dutch variant '/index.php/Special:GefacetteerdZoeken' on your wiki server.Affected if The endpoint responds with a search interface, indicating the faceted search feature is enabled
-
Check for lack of input sanitization in the endpointReview the source code of the SpecialFacetedSearch or equivalent handler class in the extension. Look for the code path that processes URL parameters and reflects them into the HTML output without using htmlspecialchars() or equivalent encoding.Affected if User-supplied URL parameters are directly reflected in the HTTP response without proper output encoding
Your wiki is affected if it runs Semantic MediaWiki with the faceted search endpoint enabled and the installed version lacks the patch for CVE-2025-10354, allowing unsanitized URL parameter reflection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch or upgrade to latest Semantic MediaWiki version; alternatively, implement output encoding/sanitization for all user input in the affected endpoint.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data