SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-10437

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Eksagate Electronic Engineering and Computer Industry Trade Inc. Webpack Management System allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Webpack Management System: through 20251119.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in Eksagate Webpack Management System allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via unsanitized input, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or data manipulation.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations, apply strict input validation, and enforce least-privilege database accounts. Consider WAF rules as an interim protective measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Eksagate Webpack Management System is installed
    Search for the application in your web server directories (e.g., /var/www/, /opt/, or C:\inetpub\) and verify the presence of Eksagate-related files or directories.
    Affected if The application is present in the environment.
  2. Identify the installed version
    Locate version information in the application's configuration files, README, or about page. Common locations include version.json, package.json, or a config.xml file within the application root.
    Affected if Unable to determine version or version is unpatched against the CVE.
  3. Verify database connectivity is in use
    Inspect the application's configuration files for database connection strings (e.g., database.config, db.php, or connection strings in appsettings.json) to confirm the system uses a SQL database.
    Affected if The application connects to a SQL database and processes user-supplied input in queries.
  4. Identify user input entry points
    Review the application's source code or configuration for endpoints that accept user input and pass it to database queries, such as search fields, login forms, or API parameters.
    Affected if User-supplied parameters are directly concatenated into SQL queries without parameterization.
  5. Check for SQL error leakage
    Enable detailed error logging in the application and database configuration, then test common input fields with special SQL characters (e.g., ' OR '1'='1) to observe whether raw SQL errors are returned.
    Affected if SQL error messages are displayed to users, indicating unsanitized input handling.
  6. Review application logs for SQL injection signatures
    Examine web server access logs and application logs for suspicious patterns such as UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, or other SQL keywords in request parameters.
    Affected if Logs contain SQL injection attempt patterns targeting the application.

The environment is affected if Eksagate Webpack Management System is installed and user-supplied input is processed in SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations, apply strict input validation, and enforce least-privilege database accounts. Consider WAF rules as an interim protective measure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10437 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10437 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data