CVE-2025-10452
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStatistical Database System developed by Gotac has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to read, modify, and delete database contents with high-level privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical missing authentication vulnerability in Gotac's Statistical Database System allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain high-privilege database access, enabling full read, write, and delete operations without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Gotac Statistical Database System presenceSearch for Gotac Statistical Database System in installed software, running services, or system inventory. Check for processes named 'gotac', 'statdb', or similar variants.Affected if The product is present in the environment
-
Check database service network exposureReview firewall rules, network configurations, and service bindings. Identify if the database port (commonly 5432, 3306, or custom) is listening on external interfaces or accessible from untrusted networks.Affected if Database service is bound to 0.0.0.0 or exposed to untrusted networks without network segmentation
-
Verify authentication is required for database connectionsAttempt a connection to the database without providing credentials, or inspect connection strings and authentication configuration files for empty passwords, trusted connections, or bypass mechanisms.Affected if Database accepts connections without credentials or uses authentication that can be bypassed
-
Check for privilege assignment configurationInspect database user roles, privilege configurations, and access control settings. Look for high-privilege accounts accessible without authentication.Affected if Unauthenticated or anonymous users can access high-privilege database roles
-
Confirm database operations are accessible without authTest basic database operations (SELECT, INSERT, DELETE) using an unauthenticated connection attempt, or review audit logs for unauthenticated database access attempts.Affected if Unauthenticated users can execute read, write, or delete operations on the database
If Gotac Statistical Database System is present AND accepts unauthenticated database connections allowing read/write/delete operations, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-10452.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms before database access, enforce privilege separation, and restrict network exposure of the database system.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $20,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10452 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10452 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data