dbcve.org
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2025-10453

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
O'View MapServer developed by PilotGaea Technologies has a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit this vulnerability to probe internal network.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

O'View MapServer by PilotGaea Technologies contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources, potentially enabling network reconnaissance and access to internal services.

MitigationImplement strict URL validation and allowlist-based request filtering to prevent the server from making arbitrary network requests; also apply network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the impact of successful SSRF exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm O'View MapServer installation
    Identify if O'View MapServer by PilotGaea Technologies is installed on the system. Check for typical installation directories, service processes, or web applications running on ports (commonly 80/443). Use 'tasklist' or 'Get-Process' to look for mapserver-related processes, or check web server document roots for O'View-specific files.
    Affected if O'View MapServer is not installed on the system, then the CVE does not apply.
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate the version information for O'View MapServer. Check the application executable, DLL version properties, or any 'about' or version information accessible through the web interface. Compare your installed version against any available version history from PilotGaea Technologies.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the affected version range for CVE-2025-10453 (check vendor documentation for specific affected versions).
  3. Verify web interface accessibility
    Confirm the O'View MapServer web interface is accessible over the network. Identify the URL endpoint where map requests can be submitted (typically through HTTP GET/POST parameters). This is where the SSRF payload would be injected.
    Affected if The map service web interface is publicly or internally accessible without authentication, making the SSRF vector reachable.
  4. Identify URL-handling parameters
    Review the application's parameter names that accept URLs or external resource paths. Common SSRF-prone parameters include 'url', 'URI', 'path', 'dest', 'next', 'data', 'reference', 'site', 'html', 'val', 'validate', 'domain', 'callback', 'return', 'page', 'feed', 'host', 'port', 'to', 'out', 'view', 'dir', 'show', 'navigation', 'open', 'file', 'document', 'folder', 'pg', 'style', 'doc', 'img', 'source', or similar names.
    Affected if The application accepts user-controlled URL parameters and makes outbound HTTP requests based on them.
  5. Test for SSRF response behavior
    If authorized and within scope, send a test request with a controlled callback URL (such as an internal IP or a monitoring endpoint) to observe if the server attempts to fetch it. Alternatively, review server logs for outbound connection attempts to unexpected destinations.
    Affected if The server makes HTTP requests to attacker-supplied URLs, confirming the SSRF vulnerability is present.

You are affected if O'View MapServer is installed, the web interface is accessible, and the application accepts and processes user-supplied URLs that trigger outbound HTTP requests from the server.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict URL validation and allowlist-based request filtering to prevent the server from making arbitrary network requests; also apply network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the impact of successful SSRF exploitation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10453 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10453 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data