CVE-2025-10492
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Java deserialisation vulnerability has been discovered in Jaspersoft Library. Improper handling of externally supplied data may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely on systems that use the affected library
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Java deserialization vulnerability in Jaspersoft Library where improper handling of externally supplied serialized data allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging unsafe deserialization gadget chains. The critical CVSS 9.8 score indicates network-exploitable, authentication-free RCE with complete impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.0.0<= 7.0.3<= 9.0.2<= 9.0.0<= 7.0.3<= 9.0.2<= 3.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Jaspersoft software is installedCheck for Jaspersoft processes, web applications, or installation directories. Common locations: /opt/jasperreports, /opt/jaspersoft, or within application server webapp directories (Tomcat/webapps, JBoss/deployments). On Windows, check Program Files for Jaspersoft folders.Affected if Jaspersoft products (Io, Library, Server, Studio, Web Studio) are present on the system regardless of version, as the check determines exposure scope.
-
Determine the installed Jaspersoft versionCheck version files in the installation directory. For Server/Studio: look for version.properties, about.html, or the WAR file name containing version numbers. For Library: check the JAR file names (jasperreports-x.x.x.jar) in the lib or classpath. Compare against affected version ranges: Library <=7.0.3 or <=9.0.2, Server <=9.0.0, Studio <=7.0.3 or <=9.0.2, Web Studio <=3.0.1, Io <=4.0.0.Affected if The installed version matches or is below any of these affected versions: Library <=7.0.3 or <=9.0.2, Server <=9.0.0, Studio <=7.0.3 or <=9.0.2, Web Studio <=3.0.1, or Io <=4.0.0.
-
Identify exposed deserialization endpointsReview web.xml and application configuration files for servlet mappings that handle serialized data. Look for endpoints accepting Java object streams: /services/*, /rest/*, /soap/*, or custom endpoints that deserialize Java objects from request bodies. Use network scanning (nmap, netstat) to identify ports exposing Jaspersoft web interfaces.Affected if Jaspersoft web interfaces with deserialization capabilities are accessible over the network without authentication.
-
Confirm if external deserialization input is acceptedInspect Java code, configuration, or proxy settings for endpoints that call ObjectInputStream or similar deserialization methods on untrusted input. Check if the application accepts serialized Java objects in HTTP requests, RMI, or JMX endpoints.Affected if The application accepts and deserializes externally supplied serialized Java data without validation or allowlisting.
The environment is affected if Jaspersoft is installed and the version falls within the affected ranges (Library <=7.0.3 or <=9.0.2, Server <=9.0.0, Studio <=7.0.3 or <=9.0.2, Web Studio <=3.0.1, Io <=4.0.0) AND deserialization endpoints accepting external input are network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches or upgrade to a patched Jaspersoft version; if immediate patching is unavailable, restrict network access to deserialization endpoints and implement input validation or allowlist controls on deserialization operations.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,232.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10492 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data