Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-1055

MEDIUM · 5.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the K7RKScan.sys driver, part of the K7 Security Anti-Malware suite, allows a local low-privilege user to send crafted IOCTL requests to terminate a wide range of processes running with administrative or system-level privileges, with the exception of those inherently protected by the operating system. This flaw stems from missing access control in the driver's IOCTL handler, enabling unprivileged users to perform privileged actions in kernel space. Successful exploitation can lead to denial of service by disrupting critical services or privileged applications.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The K7RKScan.sys kernel driver lacks proper access control validation in its IOCTL request handler, allowing any local user to send crafted IOCTL codes that can terminate arbitrary processes running with elevated privileges. This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability where an unprivileged user can cause denial of service by killing critical administrative or system-level processes.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from K7 Security when available. In the interim, restrict local user access to systems with this driver installed and monitor for suspicious process termination events.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the K7RKScan.sys driver file
    Search for the driver file in system directories: Run 'dir /s C:\Windows\System32\drivers\K7RKScan.sys' or check 'C:\Windows\System32\drivers\K7RKScan.sys' directly
    Affected if The driver file exists on the system
  2. Retrieve the driver file version
    Right-click the K7RKScan.sys file, select Properties, then go to the Details tab to view the File Version, or run 'powershell (Get-Item "C:\Windows\System32\drivers\K7RKScan.sys").VersionInfo'
    Affected if A version number is returned (driver is installed); compare against any vendor-published fixed version when available
  3. Check if the driver is currently loaded
    Open an elevated command prompt and run 'sc query K7RKScan' or 'driverquery /v | findstr K7RKScan' to query the driver service status
    Affected if The service state shows as RUNNING or the driver appears in the loaded driver list
  4. Verify driver file integrity and signature
    Right-click the driver file, select Properties, then go to the Digital Signatures tab to verify the signature is valid and from K7 Security
    Affected if The driver is signed by K7 Security but lacks a recent patch, or shows as unsigned
  5. Audit local user privileges
    Check which users have access to interact with the driver by reviewing 'icacls C:\Windows\System32\drivers\K7RKScan.sys' output
    Affected if Non-admin or unprivileged users have read or execute access to the driver file

If the K7RKScan.sys driver is present on the system and is loaded or loadable by unprivileged local users, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from K7 Security when available. In the interim, restrict local user access to systems with this driver installed and monitor for suspicious process termination events.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,970
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1055 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1055 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data