CVE-2025-10579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BackWPup – WordPress Backup & Restore Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the 'backwpup_working' AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve access to a back-up's filename while a backup is running. This information has little value on it's own, but could be used to aid in a brute force attack to retrieve back-up contents in limited environments (i.e. NGINX).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe BackWPup WordPress plugin lacks a capability check on the 'backwpup_working' AJAX action, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level privileges or higher to query backup filenames while a backup is running. This is a broken access control (CWE-862) vulnerability exposing limited metadata that could theoretically aid in brute force attempts against backup files in restricted server environments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BackWPup plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for the backwpup folder, or look for BackWPup in the WordPress admin plugins list. View the main plugin file (usually backwpup.php) to read the Version header.Affected if BackWPup plugin is installed and the installed version is lower than 5.5.1
-
Confirm low-privilege user existenceCheck WordPress user database (wp_usermeta table, wp_capabilities key) for users with the 'subscriber' role. In WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users to list roles.Affected if Any user account with Subscriber-level role exists on the site
-
Verify AJAX endpoint accessibilitySend a POST request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with action=backwpup_working while authenticated as a low-privilege user (Subscriber). Use a tool like curl with valid user credentials.Affected if The request returns a successful response (HTTP 200) without requiring higher privileges, indicating the AJAX action is accessible to subscribers
-
Check for backup filename exposureAnalyze the response from the backwpup_working AJAX action. Look for any metadata containing backup job names, filenames, or paths that should not be visible to low-privilege users.Affected if The AJAX response contains backup filenames, job identifiers, or file paths accessible to subscriber-level users
A user is affected if BackWPup version is below 5.5.1, the site has any Subscriber-level users, and the backwpup_working AJAX action returns backup metadata without proper capability validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to version 5.5.1 or later which should include the missing capability check. If no update is available, restrict the 'backwpup_working' AJAX action to users with higher privileges using a WordPress capability check or firewall rule.
BackWPup 5.5.1 or later
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate the BackWPup plugin
- If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to update to the latest version
- Alternatively, you can update by going to Dashboard > Updates and selecting BackWPup to update
- After updating, verify the version number reflects the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data