CVE-2025-10589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe N-Reporter, N-Cloud, and N-Probe developed by N-Partner has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in N-Partner's N-Reporter, N-Cloud, and N-Probe allows authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands through user input that is not properly sanitized before being passed to system shell execution functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed N-Partner productsList installed packages using 'dpkg -l | grep -i n-' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i n-', or search for running processes with 'ps aux | grep -iE "(n-reporter|n-cloud|n-probe)"'Affected if Any of N-Reporter, N-Cloud, or N-Probe is installed on the system
-
Determine product versionQuery the application for its version via the web interface (typically in About or System Info page), or check version files in common installation directories like /opt/n-partner, /usr/local/npartner, or the product's config directoryAffected if Installed version cannot be verified or falls within an affected release range
-
Confirm web interface is accessibleCheck if the product's HTTP/HTTPS service is listening with 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "(80|443|8080|8443)"' and verify network exposure with 'iptables -L -n' or by reviewing firewall rulesAffected if The management web interface is exposed to network access
-
Check authentication configurationReview user accounts and authentication settings in the product configuration files or web interface. Look for weak, default, or shared accounts that could be compromisedAffected if Authentication is enabled and user accounts exist (the vulnerability requires authenticated access)
-
Identify input handling endpointsReview web server logs for the product (typically in /var/log/n-partner or the product's log directory) and identify which parameters or API endpoints accept user input that could reach shell execution functionsAffected if User-facing input fields or API parameters are present in the application
Users are affected if any N-Reporter, N-Cloud, or N-Probe installation is running with accessible web interface and authenticated user accounts, as the vulnerability allows OS command injection through unsanitized input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches when available. Until then, restrict network access to these services, enforce strong authentication, implement strict input validation on all user-supplied parameters, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data