dbcve.org
SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-10610

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in SFS Consulting Information Processing Industry and Foreign Trade Inc. Winsure allows Blind SQL Injection. This issue affects Winsure: through Version dated 21.08.2025.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in Winsure (SFS Consulting Information Processing Industry and Foreign Trade Inc.) allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input. The CVSS 9.8 score indicates critical severity with potential for complete database compromise, data exfiltration, or system takeover. Blind SQL injection differs from standard SQL injection in that the application does not return SQL errors or query results directly, requiring attackers to infer information through behavioral differences.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions, apply strict input validation and sanitization, and restrict database account permissions to least privilege. Consider deploying a WAF as a temporary protective measure until code fixes are validated.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Winsure software is installed
    Check installed programs on Windows systems, or look for Winsure-related processes or services running on the server. Search for directories or files named 'Winsure' or 'SFS Consulting'.
    Affected if The system has SFS Consulting Winsure software installed
  2. Determine the installed version of Winsure
    Check the software's About dialog, version information in executable properties, or look for version strings in configuration files within the Winsure installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is within the affected range (verify against vendor advisories if version data becomes available)
  3. Verify if user input fields are exposed
    Access the Winsure web interface or application and identify all input fields such as login forms, search boxes, contact forms, or any parameterizable fields that accept user data.
    Affected if User input fields are accessible without authentication or with standard user credentials
  4. Check for database connectivity and configuration
    Examine the Winsure configuration files or connection strings to confirm the application connects to a SQL database. Look for database connection details in config files.
    Affected if The application uses direct SQL queries against a database without visible parameterized query implementation
  5. Inspect for input validation mechanisms
    Review application configuration or proxy/WAF logs to determine if input validation, web application firewall, or SQL injection protection is present in front of the application.
    Affected if No input validation, WAF, or SQL injection protection is configured

The environment is affected if SFS Consulting Winsure is installed and exposed user input fields accept direct SQL queries without parameterized query protection or input validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions, apply strict input validation and sanitization, and restrict database account permissions to least privilege. Consider deploying a WAF as a temporary protective measure until code fixes are validated.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10610 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10610 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data