CVE-2025-10670
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in itsourcecode E-Logbook with Health Monitoring System for COVID-19 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /check_profile.php. Executing manipulation of the argument profile_id can lead to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode E-Logbook COVID-19 Monitoring System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries via the profile_id parameter in /check_profile.php.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch the web server document root for check_profile.php. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /www/, or C:\xampp\htdocs\. Use: find /var/www/html -name 'check_profile.php' 2>/dev/nullAffected if The file check_profile.php exists in the web application directory tree
-
Verify the application versionCheck the application's version information. Look in README files, footer files, or admin dashboard for version '1.0'. Also check source code comments in check_profile.php for version identifiers.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 (Emiloi E Logbook With Health Monitoring System For Covid 19)
-
Confirm the application is accessibleVerify the web application is running and the endpoint is reachable. Attempt to access http://[target]/check_profile.php or check if the application is publicly accessible.Affected if The check_profile.php endpoint is reachable over the network
-
Identify if profile_id parameter is processedExamine check_profile.php source code to confirm it accepts and processes a profile_id parameter without sanitization. Look for direct use of $_REQUEST['profile_id'] or $_GET['profile_id'] in SQL queries without prepared statements.Affected if The code shows direct use of profile_id parameter in dynamic SQL queries without parameterized statements or input validation
You are affected if you are running Emiloi E Logbook With Health Monitoring System version 1.0 with check_profile.php accessible and the profile_id parameter handled without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in check_profile.php and implement proper input validation for the profile_id parameter.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10670 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10670 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data