CVE-2025-10679
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe ReviewX – WooCommerce Product Reviews with Multi-Criteria, Reminder Emails, Google Reviews, Schema & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary method calls in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.12. This is due to insufficient input validation in the bulkTenReviews function that allows user-controlled data to be passed directly to a variable function call mechanism. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to call arbitrary PHP class methods that take no inputs or have default values, potentially leading to information disclosure or remote code execution depending on available methods and server configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ReviewX WordPress plugin contains a vulnerability in the bulkTenReviews function where insufficient input validation allows user-controlled data to be passed directly to PHP variable function calls. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this to invoke arbitrary class methods that require no parameters or have default values, potentially achieving information disclosure or remote code execution depending on what methods are available in the plugin or loaded via WordPress.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify ReviewX plugin is installedCheck for the ReviewX plugin in your WordPress installation by looking for the reviewx directory under wp-content/plugins/, or via WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if ReviewX plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed ReviewX versionOpen the main plugin file (reviewx.php) in the reviewx plugin directory and locate the Version header in the file comments, or view the version in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins > ReviewXAffected if Installed version is lower than 2.2.13 (the patched version)
-
Confirm plugin is activeCheck the plugin status in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, or query the wp_options table for the active_plugins option containing 'reviewx'Affected if ReviewX plugin is active in the WordPress environment
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint is accessibleCheck if the WordPress AJAX endpoint /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php exposes the bulkTenReviews action, or inspect the plugin source for the bulkTenReviews function to confirm it handles unauthenticated requestsAffected if The bulkTenReviews function handles requests without authentication and without strict validation on the method parameter
If ReviewX is installed, active, version is below 2.2.13, and the bulkTenReviews function handles unauthenticated requests, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-10679
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the ReviewX plugin to version 2.2.13 or later which contains the patch. If immediate updating is not feasible, consider temporarily disabling the plugin or deploying WAF rules to block requests targeting the vulnerable function.
Latest version of ReviewX plugin (version 2.2.13 or higher)
- 1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate the ReviewX plugin
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
- 5. Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/reviewx/ and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- 6. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly on the site
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10679 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10679 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data