CVE-2025-10851
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Gym Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /ajax.php?action=login. Performing manipulation of the argument Username results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Gym Management System 1.0's login function (/ajax.php?action=login) where the Username parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm installed product and versionLocate the Campcodes Gym Management System installation and identify its version number. Check application files, readme files, or admin panels for version information. Compare to the affected version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is Campcodes Gym Management System 1.0 exactly.
-
Verify the login endpoint existsCheck if the file ajax.php exists in the web root and responds to the action=login parameter. This is typically at /ajax.php?action=loginAffected if The endpoint /ajax.php?action=login is accessible and responds to requests.
-
Examine the login function source codeLocate and inspect the ajax.php file in the web application directory. Find the code handling the login action. Look for the section that processes the Username parameter.Affected if The Username parameter from the login form is being used in SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized queries.
-
Check for SQL query construction with Username inputReview the login function code to see if the Username input is directly concatenated into SQL query strings. Look for patterns like $username in quotes within SQL statements.Affected if The Username value is being directly inserted into SQL queries without using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or input sanitization functions.
The environment is affected if running Campcodes Gym Management System version 1.0 with the /ajax.php?action=login endpoint using the Username parameter in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations in the login function, and apply input validation/sanitization for the Username parameter.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10851 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data