CVE-2025-10878
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the login functionality of Fikir Odalari AdminPando 1.0.1 before 2026-01-26. The username and password parameters are vulnerable to SQL injection, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication completely. Successful exploitation grants full administrative access to the application, including the ability to manipulate the public-facing website content (HTML/DOM manipulation).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in AdminPando's login form allows attackers to inject malicious SQL through the username and password fields, bypassing authentication entirely and gaining full administrative privileges to manipulate website content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AdminPando installationSearch your web server for files or directories containing 'adminpando' or 'Omran Fikir Odalari'. Check your application inventory or web root directories for this specific admin panel software.Affected if The software is found and appears to be the Omran Fikir Odalari Adminpando admin panel.
-
Determine installed versionLocate any version file, changelog, or metadata within the AdminPando installation (common locations: version.php, about.php, or a README file in the adminpando directory). Compare the version number to the affected range <= 1.0.1.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.1 or lower, or no version can be determined (older/unpatched installation).
-
Verify login form is accessibleAccess the AdminPando login page (typically at /adminpando/login, /adminpando, or similar path under your web root). Confirm the login form accepts username and password input.Affected if The login form is accessible and accepts input in username and password fields.
-
Review web server and database logsExamine web server access logs and database query logs for suspicious SQL syntax in login-related requests. Look for common SQL injection patterns such as single quotes ('), UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, or boolean-based payloads in username or password parameters.Affected if SQL injection patterns are found in logs targeting the login form, or unexpected SQL errors appear in application logs.
-
Audit administrator accountsQuery your database to list all user accounts with administrator privileges. Check for any unexpected or unauthorized admin accounts created outside normal registration processes.Affected if Unauthorized admin accounts exist that were not created through legitimate administrative workflows.
Your environment is affected if AdminPando (Omran Fikir Odalari) version 1.0.1 or lower is installed and its login form is accessible, particularly if version cannot be determined or suspicious login activity appears in logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (Prepared Statements) for all authentication-related database operations and apply the vendor patch immediately.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10878 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10878 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data