CVE-2025-10880
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAll versions of Dingtian DT-R002 are vulnerable to an Insufficiently Protected Credentials vulnerability that could allow an attacker to extract the proprietary "Dingtian Binary" protocol password by sending an unauthenticated GET request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Dingtian DT-R002 device exposes its proprietary protocol credentials through an unauthenticated HTTP GET request. An attacker can directly extract the 'Dingtian Binary' protocol password without any authentication, enabling further attacks against the device and potentially the network it operates in.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device model and firmware versionAccess the device's web interface or check the device label/marketing materials for 'Dingtian DT-R002' or 'Dt R002' markings. Note the firmware version if displayed in the web interface or device documentation.Affected if The device is a Dingtian Tech DT-R002 with any firmware version.
-
Locate the device on the networkScan the network for HTTP services on common ports (80, 8080, 443) or use the device's known IP address if previously documented.Affected if An HTTP service is accessible on the network for the Dingtian DT-R002 device.
-
Test unauthenticated credential endpoint accessSend an HTTP GET request to the device's web interface without providing any authentication credentials. Examine the response for plaintext protocol credentials, specifically looking for 'Dingtian Binary' protocol password or similar credential fields.Affected if The device returns protocol credentials (such as the Dingtian Binary protocol password) in the HTTP response without requiring authentication.
-
Verify credential exposure is not behind authenticationConfirm that no login form, session cookie, or authentication token is required to access the endpoint that reveals the protocol password. Compare the response to an authenticated request if possible.Affected if The credential-exposing endpoint is reachable without any authentication challenge or session.
The environment is affected if a Dingtian DT-R002 device responds to an unauthenticated HTTP GET request with protocol credentials such as the Dingtian Binary password in plaintext.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement authentication requirements for all endpoints that expose credentials, and ensure protocol passwords are not transmitted in plaintext or accessible without proper authorization.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10880 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data