Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2025-10912

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Saastech Cleaning and Internet Services Inc. TemizlikYolda allows Manipulating User-Controlled Variables. This issue affects TemizlikYolda: through 11022026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in TemizlikYolda where user-controlled variables allow manipulation of authorization decisions. This is likely an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) or improper access control flaw where an attacker can modify parameters (such as IDs, keys, or tokens) to access unauthorized resources or functionality.

MitigationImplement proper server-side authorization checks using session-based authentication and validate user permissions for every resource access. Since the vendor is unresponsive, a code review and manual fix of the authorization logic will be required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify TemizlikYolda installation
    Locate the application by searching for TemizlikYolda-specific files, directories, or application banners. Check web server logs, directory listings, or application metadata for this product name.
    Affected if TemizlikYolda is present in the environment
  2. Locate authorization logic in code
    Review application source code for authorization decision points. Search for functions that handle user permissions, access control, or session validation. Identify where user-supplied parameters (IDs, keys, tokens) are used in access control checks.
    Affected if Authorization logic relies on user-controllable parameters without server-side validation
  3. Identify parameter injection points
    Search for code sections where request parameters (such as IDs, object references, or tokens) are directly used in database queries or access control checks without proper validation. Look for patterns like directly using GET/POST values in WHERE clauses or permission checks.
    Affected if User-controlled parameters are passed directly into authorization decisions without sanitization
  4. Test for IDOR vulnerability
    Intercept HTTP requests and modify identifier parameters (user IDs, record IDs, resource keys) to access objects belonging to other users. Compare responses when legitimate and manipulated values are submitted.
    Affected if Modifying ID, key, or token parameters allows access to unauthorized resources or data belonging to other users
  5. Verify session-based authorization enforcement
    Review authentication implementation to confirm session tokens are validated server-side for every protected resource access. Check if authorization occurs after authentication and before resource delivery.
    Affected if Authorization is not enforced server-side for each resource access or can be bypassed via parameter manipulation

Users are affected if the TemizlikYolda application is present and its authorization logic uses user-supplied parameters without proper server-side validation, allowing unauthorized access via parameter manipulation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper server-side authorization checks using session-based authentication and validate user permissions for every resource access. Since the vendor is unresponsive, a code review and manual fix of the authorization logic will be required.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10912 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10912 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data