CVE-2025-10941
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in Topaz SERVCore Teller 2.14.0-RC2/2.14.1. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file SERVCoreTeller_2.0.40D.msi of the component Installer. Executing manipulation can lead to permission issues. The attack needs to be launched locally. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor explains, that "this vulnerability was detected at the beginning of 2025, it was remediated because the latest published version of the installer no longer uses "nssm," which is responsible for this vulnerability".
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the Topaz SERVCore Teller installer (SERVCoreTeller_2.0.40D.msi) which uses the nssm (Non-Sucking Service Manager) tool to install Windows services. The manipulation of the installer leads to permission issues, likely involving improper service configuration allowing privilege escalation or unauthorized service manipulation. The attack requires local access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Topaz SERVCore Teller installationCheck Add/Remove Programs or Program Files for Topaz SERVCore Teller. Look for SERVCoreTeller_2.0.40D.msi in installed programs or search for 'Topaz' or 'SERVCore' in the system.Affected if The application is installed and the version is 2.0.40D or earlier
-
Identify installed versionOpen the Windows installer database (MSI) or check the installed program's version property. In PowerShell: Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*SERVCore*'} | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersionAffected if Version displayed is 2.0.40D or any version prior to the vendor fix
-
Locate nssm.exe in the application directorySearch the Topaz SERVCore installation folder for nssm.exe (Non-Sucking Service Manager). Common paths: C:\Program Files\Topaz\SERVCore\ or the install directory found in registry.Affected if nssm.exe exists in the Topaz installation directory, indicating the vulnerable tool is present
-
Inspect Windows services installed by the applicationRun 'sc query' or open Services.msc and look for services with 'Topaz', 'SERVCore', or 'Teller' in the name. Check the service binary path using 'sc qc <servicename>' to confirm it references nssm.exe.Affected if A Topaz-related Windows service exists and its binary path points to nssm.exe or references the Topaz installer path containing nssm
-
Check service file permissionsUse icacls or PowerShell Get-Acl on the nssm.exe binary and any Topaz service executables. Verify if non-admin users have write or modify permissions to these files.Affected if Non-privileged users have write, modify, or full control permissions on nssm.exe or service-related executables in the Topaz installation folder
You are affected if Topaz SERVCore Teller version 2.0.40D or earlier is installed AND nssm.exe is present in the application directory, creating a potential privilege escalation vector through service configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to the latest version of Topaz SERVCore Teller where the vendor has removed the nssm dependency, eliminating this permission vulnerability.
Latest version of SERVCoreTeller (vendor states nssm has been removed)
- Contact Topaz to obtain the latest version of SERVCoreTeller installer that no longer uses nssm
- Verify the new installer version does not include the nssm.exe utility
- Apply the latest installer to update Topaz SERVCore Teller
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10941 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10941 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data