CVE-2025-1100
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA CWE-259 "Use of Hard-coded Password" for the root account in Q-Free MaxTime less than or equal to version 2.11.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via SSH.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceQ-Free MaxTime version 2.11.0 and earlier contains a hard-coded password for the root account (CWE-259). An unauthenticated remote attacker can leverage this vulnerability by connecting via SSH and using the hard-coded credentials to gain root-level access, enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Q-Free MaxTime installationIdentify if Q-Free MaxTime software is present on the system by checking for product-specific processes, services, or installation directories typical for this applicationAffected if Q-Free MaxTime is installed on the system
-
Check installed versionDetermine the installed version of Q-Free MaxTime and compare against the affected range: version 2.11.0 and earlierAffected if The installed version is 2.11.0 or earlier
-
Verify SSH service is enabledCheck if the SSH service is running and accessible on the affected system, as this is the attack vector for the hardcoded credentialAffected if SSH service is enabled and reachable on the network
-
Confirm root SSH login is permittedInspect SSH configuration to determine if root login is allowed, either directly or via password authenticationAffected if Root login via SSH is permitted on the system
-
Check for hardcoded credential presenceExamine system files, configuration, or embedded credentials that may contain the hardcoded root password associated with this CVEAffected if A hardcoded root password exists in the system configuration or embedded files
The system is affected if it runs Q-Free MaxTime version 2.11.0 or earlier with SSH enabled and root login permitted, exposing the hardcoded root credential to unauthenticated remote attackers
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately restrict SSH access to trusted IP addresses via firewall rules, disable root SSH login if possible, and contact Q-Free for an emergency patch or firmware update that removes the hard-coded credential.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1100 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1100 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data