CVE-2025-11022
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Personal Project Panilux allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This CSRF vulnerability resulting in Command Injection has been identified. This issue affects Panilux: before v.0.10.0. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and responded that they deny ownership of the mentioned product.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Panilux personal project allows attackers to trick authenticated users into executing unintended commands. The CSRF flaw enables command injection, giving attackers arbitrary command execution on the system with the privileges of the affected user. The vulnerability affects all versions prior to v0.10.0.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Panilux is present in your environmentSearch for Panilux-related files, processes, or services running on the system. Look for any application named 'panilux' or directories containing 'panilux' in the name.Affected if Panilux software is installed and running on the system
-
Determine the installed version of PaniluxCheck the application's version information through its binary, package manager, or any version file (such as a version.txt, about page, or CLI version flag). Compare the version number to v0.10.0.Affected if The installed version is lower than v0.10.0 (e.g., v0.9.x, v0.8.x, etc.)
-
Verify if user authentication is enabledInspect the application configuration or settings to determine whether user accounts or authentication are configured and active.Affected if User authentication is enabled and users can log in to the Panilux application
-
Check for anti-CSRF protection on state-changing operationsReview the application's source code or configuration to verify whether state-changing operations (such as command execution, settings modification, or administrative actions) implement anti-CSRF tokens or validation.Affected if State-changing operations lack proper anti-CSRF token validation or use predictable/non-random tokens
-
Inspect input handling for command injection vectorsExamine how user inputs are processed, particularly any fields or parameters that interact with system commands, shell execution, or file operations.Affected if User inputs are passed directly to system command execution functions without sanitization or validation
You are affected if Panilux is running with a version lower than v0.10.0 and has user authentication enabled, as the CSRF vulnerability allows authenticated users to be tricked into executing arbitrary commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement anti-CSRF tokens with proper validation on state-changing operations and sanitize/validate all user inputs to prevent command injection. Consider upgrading to v0.10.0 or later if available.
v.0.10.0
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Personal Project Panilux
- 2. Back up all configuration files and data
- 3. Upgrade the installation to version 0.10.0 or later
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- 5. Test that the application functions correctly post-upgrade
- 6. Monitor for any abnormal behavior or security events
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11022 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data