CVE-2025-11046
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the baseUrl parameter in the /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test endpoint (testEmbeddingModel function) to make the server perform arbitrary requests to attacker-controlled resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Tencent WeKnora installationLocate the WeKnora application installation directory or check running services for WeKnora. Common locations include /opt/weknora, /usr/local/weknora, or check running processes for 'weknora' or 'wek'Affected if Tencent WeKnora version 0.1.0 is installed and running
-
Verify the installed versionCheck the version of Tencent WeKnora by inspecting the application metadata, package.json, setup.py, or the main application file where version is defined. Run: find . -name 'package.json' -o -name 'setup.py' -o -name 'version*' 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -i version 2>/dev/nullAffected if The version returned is exactly 0.1.0
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint existsCheck if the file containing the testEmbeddingModel function exists. Look for routes or API definitions that map to /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. Inspect the application source code for the testEmbeddingModel function definitionAffected if The endpoint /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test is defined and the testEmbeddingModel function exists in the codebase
-
Check if the endpoint is accessible without authenticationAttempt to access the endpoint with a GET or POST request, providing a test baseUrl value such as http://localhost:9999. Example: curl -X POST http://<server>/api/v1/initialization/embedding/test -d '{"baseUrl":"http://example.com"}'Affected if The endpoint responds without requiring authentication or proper authorization, allowing arbitrary baseUrl parameter values
You are affected if Tencent WeKnora version 0.1.0 is installed and the /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test endpoint with the baseUrl parameter is accessible without strict validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to the latest version of Tencent WeKnora; if upgrade is not possible, implement strict allowlist validation for the baseUrl parameter to only permit trusted endpoints.
latest stable release
- 1. Upgrade Tencent Weknora to the latest stable release available from the vendor
- 2. After upgrading, verify that the /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test endpoint no longer allows arbitrary baseUrl manipulation
- 3. Confirm the SSRF vulnerability is remediated by testing the endpoint with an internal IP address (e.g., 127.0.0.1) as baseUrl - the request should be rejected or fail
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11046 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11046 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data