CVE-2025-11066
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in code-projects Online Bidding System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /administrator/bidlist.php. Executing manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in code-projects Online Bidding System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the ID parameter in /administrator/bidlist.php. The unsanitized input is directly used in SQL queries, enabling data exfiltration, manipulation, or potentially remote code execution depending on database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Fabian Online Bidding System version 1.0 is installedLocate the application directory and check for version identifiers in source files, README, or configuration files. Common paths may include /administrator/ or the web root directory where the application is deployed.Affected if The installed version is Fabian Online Bidding System 1.0
-
Locate bidlist.php in the administrator directorySearch for the file bidlist.php within the application structure, typically found under /administrator/ path in the web root.Affected if The file bidlist.php exists in the /administrator/ directory of the application
-
Verify the application is accessible over the networkConfirm the web server is running and the Online Bidding System is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely, so the application must be reachable.Affected if The application is accessible over the network (HTTP/HTTPS)
-
Inspect the ID parameter handling in bidlist.phpOpen bidlist.php and search for SQL query statements that use the ID parameter. Look for direct insertion of $_GET['id'] or $_POST['id'] into SQL queries without sanitization functions like mysqli_real_escape_string, prepared statements, or parameter binding.Affected if The code shows direct use of the ID parameter in SQL queries without sanitization, prepared statements, or parameterized queries
You are affected if Fabian Online Bidding System version 1.0 is installed, bidlist.php exists, and the ID parameter is handled in SQL queries without sanitization or prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries in bidlist.php with parameterized queries/prepared statements to properly sanitize the ID parameter. Apply input validation as an additional defense layer and conduct thorough penetration testing post-remediation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11066 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11066 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data