CVE-2025-11094
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /pages/admin_product_details.php. Such manipulation of the argument prod_id leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the admin_product_details.php file allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the unsanitized prod_id parameter. The CVSS 9.8 score indicates this can be exploited without authentication, potentially leading to full database compromise including exposure of user credentials, order data, and administrative access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of E-Commerce WebsiteCheck your application documentation, composer.json, or the application's About/Version page to determine if the installed version is 1.0. Compare against the affected version range: Fabian E Commerce Site = 1.0Affected if The installed version is 1.0 of Fabian E Commerce Site
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch for the file /pages/admin_product_details.php in your web server's document root or application directory. This is the file containing the vulnerability.Affected if The file /pages/admin_product_details.php exists in your installation
-
Verify the prod_id parameter handlingOpen /pages/admin_product_details.php and search for code that handles the prod_id parameter from GET or POST requests. Look for SQL queries that use this parameter without prepared statements or parameterized queries.Affected if The prod_id parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or proper escaping
-
Test the parameter for SQL injectionIf you have access to a non-production environment, send a crafted request such as /pages/admin_product_details.php?prod_id=1' OR '1'='1 to observe if the application returns unexpected data or SQL errorsAffected if The application returns unexpected results or SQL error messages when special characters are passed to prod_id
You are affected if you are running Fabian E Commerce Site version 1.0 and the file /pages/admin_product_details.php contains unparameterized SQL queries using the prod_id parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace the vulnerable SQL query with parameterized queries/prepared statements to properly sanitize the prod_id parameter input. Also audit the entire codebase for similar SQL injection vulnerabilities given this indicates potential systemic secure coding issues.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11094 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data