CVE-2025-11106
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in code-projects Simple Scheduling System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /schedulingsystem/addfaculty.php. Such manipulation of the argument falname leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the addfaculty.php file of Simple Scheduling System 1.0. The falname parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Simple Scheduling System installationSearch the system for files or directories named 'schedulingsystem', 'addfaculty.php', or look for application directories containing scheduling-related PHP files.Affected if The application is found on the system
-
Identify the installed versionCheck the application source code, any version file, or README for version information. The affected version is 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 of Fabian Simple Scheduling System
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsConfirm the presence of /schedulingsystem/addfaculty.php in the web root or application directory.Affected if The file addfaculty.php exists in the schedulingsystem directory
-
Determine if the application is web-accessibleCheck if the web server serves the application and the /schedulingsystem/addfaculty.php endpoint is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS.Affected if The application is accessible via web and the addfaculty.php endpoint is reachable
-
Check for network exposureVerify whether the vulnerable PHP file can be reached from external networks or the internet.Affected if The addfaculty.php file is exposed to untrusted networks
You are affected if Fabian Simple Scheduling System version 1.0 is installed with the addfaculty.php file accessible via the web.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for the falname parameter in addfaculty.php. Implement input validation and use the database API's escaping functions as an additional layer of defense.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11106 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11106 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data