CVE-2025-11126
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in Apeman ID71 218.53.203.117. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /system/www/system.ini. The manipulation results in hard-coded credentials. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceHard-coded credentials discovered in the system.ini configuration file (/system/www/system.ini) on the Apeman ID71 device at IP 218.53.203.117. This allows remote attackers to authenticate using static credentials embedded in the firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is Apeman ID71Access the device web interface or check the device label/documentation to verify the model number is Apeman ID71Affected if The device is not an Apeman ID71 model, this specific CVE does not apply
-
Locate the system.ini configuration fileAttempt to access http://<device_ip>/system/www/system.ini or check the device firmware for the file at /system/www/system.iniAffected if The system.ini file exists and contains credentials, the device is likely affected
-
Examine system.ini for embedded credentialsOpen the system.ini file and look for username/password fields or credential-like strings (e.g., user=, pass=, admin=, password=)Affected if Hard-coded username/password pairs are present in the file, the device contains the documented vulnerability
-
Check if remote management is enabledReview device network settings for remote management, WAN access, or web interface accessibility from external interfacesAffected if Remote access is enabled and the device is network-accessible, the hard-coded credentials could be exploited remotely
-
Determine network exposureVerify if the device IP (such as 218.53.203.117) or its management interface is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The device is directly exposed to the internet or untrusted LAN segments, exploitation is possible
The device is affected if it is an Apeman ID71 with a system.ini file at /system/www/system.ini containing hard-coded credentials and the device or its management interface is network-accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate the affected device from untrusted networks immediately. Since the vendor is unresponsive, assess device replacement or firmware from alternative sources; if credentials can be changed, do so and monitor for unauthorized access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11126 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11126 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data