Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2025-11221

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in GTONE ChangeFlow allows Path Traversal, Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects ChangeFlow: from All versions through v9.0.1.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

GTONE ChangeFlow versions up to v9.0.1.1 contain a path traversal vulnerability combined with unrestricted file upload and improper ACL enforcement, allowing attackers to write files to arbitrary directories and access functionality outside their authorized scope. The combination of path traversal and dangerous file type upload could enable remote code execution.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on all file path inputs to prevent directory traversal sequences, enforce allow-list based file type restrictions on uploads, and review ACL configurations to ensure all functionality is properly constrained by role-based access controls. Upgrading to a patched version from the vendor is recommended.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed GTONE ChangeFlow version
    Locate the application version through the web interface (typically in About/Help sections, or check version files in the installation directory such as VERSION.txt, build.properties, or the WAR file manifest)
    Affected if The installed version is v9.0.1.1 or any earlier version (versions up to and including 9.0.1.1 are affected)
  2. Review file upload endpoint configurations
    Inspect the application's configuration files (such as web.xml, application.properties, or custom configuration XMLs) for servlet mappings or controllers handling file upload functionality. Check for upload endpoints in the web application's deployment descriptor
    Affected if File upload endpoints exist without explicit allow-list restrictions on file types or without validation of the upload path
  3. Inspect file path input validation
    Examine the application's source code or decompiled classes (if accessible) for file upload handling logic. Look for file path parameters in upload-related methods and check whether they sanitize or reject path traversal sequences like ../ or ..\
    Affected if File upload functionality accepts path parameters without validating or rejecting directory traversal sequences
  4. Verify ACL and role-based access control configurations
    Review the application's security configuration files (security XML, Spring security config, or database-backed role tables) to identify all defined roles and their permitted actions. Check if guest or low-privilege users can access administrative or elevated functions
    Affected if ACL configurations allow users with limited roles to access functionality or resources outside their authorized scope
  5. Test for path traversal in file operations
    If you have authorized testing access, attempt a controlled file upload with a modified filename containing ../ sequences to determine whether the application writes files outside the intended upload directory
    Affected if The application writes uploaded files to locations outside the designated upload directory based on path traversal input

You are affected if GTONE ChangeFlow v9.0.1.1 or any earlier version is installed AND file upload functionality with path traversal vulnerabilities is accessible to your users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation on all file path inputs to prevent directory traversal sequences, enforce allow-list based file type restrictions on uploads, and review ACL configurations to ensure all functionality is properly constrained by role-based access controls. Upgrading to a patched version from the vendor is recommended.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
40.0 hours of engineering $7,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11221 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11221 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data