CVE-2025-11253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Aksis Technology Inc. Netty ERP allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Netty ERP: before V.1.1000.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in Netty ERP before version V.1.1000 where user-supplied input is not properly neutralized before being used in SQL queries. This allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially exposing or manipulating the entire database. The CVSS 9.8 indicates the attack is network-exploitable, requires no authentication, and has no user interaction required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Netty ERP installation and versionLocate the Netty ERP installation directory and find the version identifier file (commonly named version.txt, about, or manifest file in the application root or config directory). Compare the installed version number to V.1.1000.Affected if The installed version is lower than V.1.1000, indicating the vendor patch has not been applied.
-
Confirm the application is network-accessibleDetermine if the Netty ERP web interface or API endpoints are exposed to network access. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configuration, or networkACLs that govern access to the ERP system.Affected if The ERP system is reachable from untrusted networks (such as the internet or shared network segments), enabling remote unauthenticated attackers to send malicious requests.
-
Identify user input fields that interact with the databaseReview the application's source code, configuration, or API endpoints for parameters that accept user-supplied input (such as search fields, login forms, report filters, or ID parameters). Trace these inputs to verify they are passed to database query execution points.Affected if User input fields exist that directly construct SQL queries without using parameterized queries or prepared statements.
-
Inspect database query implementationExamine the code handling database interactions (commonly found in data access layer files, DAO classes, or query builder modules). Look for raw SQL concatenation with user variables, string interpolation in query definitions, or dynamic query construction.Affected if Database queries are built by concatenating or interpolating user input directly into SQL strings without sanitization or parameterized binding.
-
Review authentication and access control configurationCheck whether the vulnerable SQL injection entry points require authentication. Examine the application's security configuration, session management, and endpoint protection settings.Affected if The affected input fields are accessible without authentication or with weak access controls, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL.
The environment is affected if Netty ERP version is below V.1.1000 and user input fields are used in database queries without parameterized queries or proper input sanitization, especially if the application is network-accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Netty ERP to version V.1.1000 or later to obtain the vendor patch. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions and apply input validation as a temporary mitigation.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data