CVE-2025-11310
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in Tipray 厦门天锐科技股份有限公司 Data Leakage Prevention System 天锐数据泄露防护系统 1.0. The affected element is the function findFileServerPage of the file findFileServerPage.do. Executing manipulation of the argument sort can lead to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Tipray Data Leakage Prevention System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through the 'sort' parameter in the findFileServerPage.do endpoint, specifically in the findFileServerPage function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Tipray Data Leakage Prevention System versionLocate the installed version through the product's admin interface, about page, or version documentation. Check the application banner or system information page if available.Affected if Installed version is exactly 1.0 (only this version is listed as affected)
-
Verify findFileServerPage.do endpoint is accessibleCheck if the /findFileServerPage.do endpoint responds on the application server. This is typically found under the web application's path.Affected if The endpoint is publicly or internally accessible without authentication
-
Confirm the sort parameter is acceptedSend a test request to the endpoint with a sort parameter (e.g., sort=id) and observe if the application processes it without error or sanitization warnings.Affected if The sort parameter is accepted and used in database queries without apparent input validation
-
Check network exposure of the applicationDetermine if the application is reachable over the network by testing HTTP/HTTPS access to the web interface.Affected if The application is accessible remotely (the vulnerability is described as allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject SQL)
A user is affected if they have Tipray Data Leakage Prevention System version 1.0 deployed with the findFileServerPage.do endpoint accessible and the sort parameter accepted by the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the sort parameter; apply input validation and sanitization; consider WAF rules as temporary mitigation given vendor non-responsiveness.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11310 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11310 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data