CVE-2025-11336
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform up to 2.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /stAlarmConfigure/index.do/../../aloneReport/download.do;otherlogout.do. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to path traversal. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability exists in the Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform (versions up to 2.2) within the file download functionality at /aloneReport/download.do. By manipulating the fileName parameter with directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../), an attacker can access arbitrary files on the server file system, potentially exposing sensitive configuration files, credentials, or application source code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Four-Faith Water Conservancy Platform installationExamine the web application HTTP responses, check for Four-Faith branding in HTML title/meta tags, or inspect installed web application files for this platform's componentsAffected if The platform is deployed and serves HTTP responses identifying it as the Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform
-
Determine installed versionCheck application version information in deployment files, about pages, or HTTP headers/banners; compare against the affected range (up to 2.2)Affected if Installed version is 2.2 or lower
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint existsSend an HTTP request to /aloneReport/download.do and observe if the endpoint responds (even with an error)Affected if The endpoint returns any application-generated response, indicating it exists and is reachable
-
Test for path traversal vulnerabilitySend a request to /aloneReport/download.do with a crafted fileName parameter containing directory traversal sequences (e.g., fileName=../../../../etc/passwd or fileName=../../conf/server.xml); inspect the HTTP response for file contents or path errorsAffected if The application returns file contents from outside the intended download directory, or reveals resolved file paths in error messages
-
Review web application file system permissionsInspect the user context and file permissions under which the web application server runs; check what directories and files are readable by that processAffected if The application runs with permissions that allow reading sensitive system files (e.g., configuration files, credentials, source code)
You are affected if the Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform version 2.2 or lower is installed, the /aloneReport/download.do endpoint is accessible, and the fileName parameter allows directory traversal to access files outside the intended directory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation on the fileName parameter to restrict access to an allowed directory whitelist, use canonical path resolution to verify the final resolved path lies within the intended base directory, and ensure the web application runs with minimal file system permissions.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11336 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11336 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data