CVE-2025-11337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform up to 2.2. This affects an unknown part of the file /aloneReport/index.do/../../aloneReport/download.do;othersusrlogout.do. Performing manipulation of the argument fileName results in path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFour-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform versions up to 2.2 contain a path traversal vulnerability in the file download functionality. Attackers can manipulate the fileName parameter in /aloneReport/download.do combined with directory traversal sequences (..) to access arbitrary files on the server filesystem.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform is installedCheck running web services, examine deployed web applications, or look for installation directories containing 'Four-Faith' or 'Water Conservancy' in the name. Inspect HTTP responses for application-specific banners or identifiers.Affected if The platform is present in the environment
-
Determine the installed versionCheck version files within the application installation directory, examine the application configuration, or query the application for its version information. Compare the installed version against the affected range (versions up to and including 2.2).Affected if The installed version is 2.2 or lower
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint existsSend a request to the /aloneReport/download.do endpoint or check if this URL path is accessible in the application's routing configuration.Affected if The /aloneReport/download.do endpoint is accessible
-
Check if fileName parameter accepts directory traversalInspect the application's handling of the fileName parameter in download functionality. Review input validation logic or test with a benign path traversal sequence in a controlled test environment.Affected if The application does not filter or reject directory traversal sequences (..) in the fileName parameter
A user is affected if the Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform version 2.2 or lower is installed, the /aloneReport/download.do endpoint is accessible, and the fileName parameter lacks proper validation to block directory traversal sequences.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation on the fileName parameter to reject directory traversal sequences (..) and restrict file downloads to an allowed directory whitelist.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data