CVE-2025-11404
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Hotel and Lodge Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /pages/save_tax.php. Executing manipulation of the argument percentage can lead to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Hotel and Lodge Management System 1.0's /pages/save_tax.php allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the 'percentage' parameter. With a CVSS score of 9.8, this critical flaw could enable complete database compromise, including unauthorized data access, modification, or potential remote code execution depending on database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the Hotel and Lodge Management System is installedLook for the application directory on the web server. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /www/, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\. Search for files containing 'hotel', 'lodge', or 'management' in the name.Affected if The application is found and served by the web server
-
Check the installed versionCheck application version information - look for a version file, about page, or check the source code for version identifiers. The affected version is specifically 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /pages/save_tax.php exists in the web application directory. This is the file containing the SQL injection vulnerability.Affected if The file pages/save_tax.php exists in the application
-
Confirm the application is network-accessibleDetermine if the web application is accessible over the network. Attempt to access the login page or any public-facing endpoint.Affected if The application is accessible from a network or the internet
-
Check if the save_tax.php endpoint accepts inputExamine the application's tax management functionality. The save_tax.php endpoint receives a 'percentage' parameter. Look for tax configuration or creation features in the application.Affected if The tax functionality that uses save_tax.php is accessible and accepts user input
A user is affected if they are running version 1.0 of the Hotel and Lodge Management System with the pages/save_tax.php file present and accessible, where the tax percentage input feature is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations involving the percentage parameter, apply strict input validation, and ensure the database user follows least-privilege principles. Review and audit other files in the application for similar SQL injection vulnerabilities.
- Locate the vulnerable file /pages/save_tax.php in the application root.
- Open the file in a text editor and locate the SQL query that uses the 'percentage' parameter (e.g., $_POST['percentage'] or $_GET['percentage']).
- Replace the direct concatenation of the parameter into the SQL string with a prepared statement (using PDO or MySQLi).
- Bind the 'percentage' value as an integer or float, for example: $stmt->bindValue(':percentage', (int)$percentage, PDO::PARAM_INT);
- Alternatively, cast the input to an integer or float before using it: $percentage = (int)$_POST['percentage']; or $percentage = (float)$_POST['percentage'];
- Ensure the database user credentials used by the application have only the minimum required privileges (e.g., no DROP, CREATE, or GRANT).
- Test the changes in a staging environment by submitting valid tax percentage values and confirming correct storage in the database.
- Deploy the patched file to production.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11404 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11404 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data