CVE-2025-11475
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in projectworlds Advanced Library Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /view_member.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument user_id can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the user_id parameter of /view_member.php in Advanced Library Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands by manipulating the parameter, potentially enabling data exfiltration, authentication bypass, or complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch for view_member.php in the web application directory. Common paths may include /admin/, /library/, or the root web directory.Affected if The file view_member.php exists in the application.
-
Verify the product versionCheck for version indicators such as a README file, footer in HTML source, or configuration files that may indicate the application version. Compare against version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is Projectworlds Advanced Library Management System 1.0.
-
Inspect the vulnerable code in view_member.phpOpen view_member.php and locate the section handling the user_id parameter. Look for unsanitized SQL queries that directly incorporate the user_id parameter into WHERE clauses or other SQL statements.Affected if The user_id parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitization functions.
-
Confirm the attack surface is exposedDetermine if view_member.php is accessible via the web server without authentication barriers. Check for login requirements or access control restrictions on this endpoint.Affected if view_member.php is accessible to unauthenticated or low-privilege users via HTTP requests.
If the application is Projectworlds Advanced Library Management System version 1.0 and view_member.php contains unsanitized user_id parameter usage in SQL queries, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-11475.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace direct string concatenation in SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) and implement proper input validation on the user_id parameter.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11475 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11475 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data