CVE-2025-11488
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in D-Link DIR-852 up to 20251002. This affects an unknown part of the file /HNAP1/. Executing manipulation can lead to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in D-Link DIR-852 routers (firmware up to 20251002) affecting the /HNAP1/ interface. An attacker can execute arbitrary commands on the device remotely without authentication due to insufficient input validation, leading to full device compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the device label or access the web interface and look for the model number in the status or system information pageAffected if The device is not a D-Link DIR-852, then it is not affected by this specific CVE
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the router web interface, go to Status or System settings, and note the firmware version date. Compare it to 20251002Affected if The firmware version date is 20251002 or earlier, meaning the device may have the vulnerability
-
Verify if the HNAP1 interface is accessibleAttempt to access http://[router-ip]/HNAP1/ from a browser. A successful connection (any response, even an error) indicates the interface is enabledAffected if The HNAP1 interface returns a response (even an error message), confirming it is active and potentially exploitable
-
Check if remote management is enabledIn the router web interface, go to Settings > Remote Management or Advanced > Remote Management, and see if 'Enable Remote Management' or similar option is turned onAffected if Remote management is enabled and the HNAP1 interface is accessible from WAN, the device is at higher risk of unauthenticated exploitation
A D-Link DIR-852 router with firmware dated 20251002 or earlier that has the HNAP1 interface accessible (especially from WAN) is affected by CVE-2025-11488 and vulnerable to unauthenticated command injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince D-Link DIR-852 is end-of-life and no longer supported, immediate network isolation is recommended; replace with a currently supported router. If continued use is required, restrict HNAP1 interface access via firewall rules and disable remote management.
- Recognize that the D-Link DIR-852 is end-of-life (EOL) and no longer supported by the vendor, meaning no official firmware patch will be released for CVE-2025-11488.
- Replace the affected D-Link DIR-852 device with a currently supported router model from D-Link or another vendor that receives regular security updates.
- If immediate replacement is not feasible, implement network-level mitigations: configure the router's firewall to block all external access to the /HNAP1/ interface (port 80/443) from the WAN side, or disable remote management entirely if not required.
- If the router must remain in service, consider placing it behind a properly configured upstream firewall and limiting its network exposure to minimize the attack surface for this command injection vulnerability.
- Document the EOL status and the need for replacement in the organization's asset management and risk acceptance records.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11488 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11488 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data