PowerjobApplication

CVE-2025-11581

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in PowerJob up to 5.1.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /openApi/runJob of the component OpenAPIController. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

PowerJob versions up to 5.1.2 contain a missing authorization vulnerability in the OpenAPIController's /openApi/runJob endpoint. Remote attackers can trigger job execution without authentication or proper authorization checks, allowing unauthorized job initiation.

MitigationImplement robust authorization checks on the /openApi/runJob endpoint to verify user permissions before allowing job execution. Consider requiring authentication tokens and validating role-based access control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PowerjobApplication
Affected:<= 5.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify PowerJob installation and version
    Locate the PowerJob installation directory and check the version file or JAR manifest. Common locations include /opt/powerjob, the application root, or the deployed WAR/JAR file. Look for a version file or check the jar properties.
    Affected if PowerJob version is 5.1.2 or lower (any version up to and including 5.1.2)
  2. Verify /openApi/runJob endpoint is exposed
    Check if the PowerJob web application is accessible and the OpenAPI endpoint is reachable. Attempt a GET or POST request to the /openApi/runJob path (or /openapi/runJob depending on case sensitivity). Inspect the application's exposed ports and web configuration.
    Affected if The /openApi/runJob endpoint is accessible from the network without being blocked by network-level restrictions
  3. Test for missing authorization
    Send a request to the /openApi/runJob endpoint without including any authentication tokens, headers, or session cookies. Observe whether the request is processed or rejected due to missing authorization.
    Affected if The endpoint accepts and processes requests without requiring authentication tokens, session cookies, or any form of authorization credentials
  4. Check Spring Security or authentication configuration
    Inspect the application's configuration files (application.yml, application.properties, or security configuration classes) for any security filters, Spring Security setup, or authentication requirements applied to the /openApi/** endpoints.
    Affected if No authentication or authorization rules are defined for the /openApi/runJob endpoint, or the endpoint is explicitly excluded from security filters

Your environment is affected if you are running PowerJob version 5.1.2 or lower and the /openApi/runJob endpoint is accessible without requiring authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.1.2
Interim mitigation

Implement robust authorization checks on the /openApi/runJob endpoint to verify user permissions before allowing job execution. Consider requiring authentication tokens and validating role-based access control.

Fix this in Powerjob Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11581 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11581 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data