CVE-2025-11636
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in Tomofun Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Account Handler. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Account Handler component of Tomofun Furbo 360 dog camera firmware up to version FB0035_FW_036. An attacker can manipulate account-related processing to make the device issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 036CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Furbo 360 firmware versionLocate the firmware version through the Furbo mobile app settings, device admin interface, or by checking the device label/packaging. Common paths: App > Settings > Device Info > Firmware VersionAffected if The installed firmware version is 036 or lower (any version <= FB0035_FW_036)
-
Confirm device model is Furbo 360Verify the specific model number matches Furbo 360 (FB0035 or similar designation). This vulnerability affects only the Furbo 360 model, not other Furbo variantsAffected if The device is a Furbo 360 model with firmware <= 036
-
Check Account Handler accessibilityDetermine if the Account Handler component is exposed on the network. This is typically accessible via the device's web interface or API endpoints. Review network exposure through port scans or firewall rules targeting the device IPAffected if The Account Handler component is network-accessible (no network segmentation or access controls blocking it)
-
Assess network isolationExamine whether the Furbo device is placed on a restricted network segment. Check VLAN configuration, firewall rules, and whether the device can reach internal network resources or arbitrary external IPsAffected if The device has unrestricted network access without segmentation or egress filtering
You are affected if your Furbo 360 is running firmware version 036 or lower AND the Account Handler component is network-accessible, allowing potential SSRF exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond, implement network segmentation to isolate the device and deploy WAF/IPS rules to detect and block SSRF attempts. Contact the vendor through alternative channels to request a firmware patch.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11636 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11636 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data