CVE-2025-11771
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Cryptocurrency (Token), Launchpad (Presale), ICO & IDO, Airdrop by TokenICO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthenticated and unauthorized modification of data due to missing authentication and capability checks on the 'createSaleRecord' function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.7. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to manipulate presales counters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe TokenICO WordPress plugin has a missing authorization vulnerability in the 'createSaleRecord' function through version 2.4.7. This function, intended to record presale transactions, lacks both authentication verification and capability checks, allowing any unauthenticated user to make arbitrary API calls that modify presale counter data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify TokenICO plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin panel and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'TokenICO' in the list of active plugins.Affected if TokenICO plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check installed TokenICO versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Find TokenICO and note the version number displayed below the plugin name. Compare against the affected range (versions through 2.4.7).Affected if The installed version is 2.4.7 or earlier
-
Inspect the createSaleRecord function accessLocate the plugin files via FTP or file manager (typically at wp-content/plugins/tokenico/). Examine the PHP file containing the 'createSaleRecord' function and verify if it registers a REST API endpoint or action hook without any authentication or capability checks.Affected if The createSaleRecord function is hooked to a public-facing action or REST route without require_auth, permission_callback, or capability checks such as 'manage_options'
-
Test unauthenticated access to the vulnerable endpointUsing a tool like curl or Burp Suite, send a POST request to the suspected endpoint (commonly /wp-json/tokenico/v1/sale or similar REST routes) without providing any authentication tokens. Check if the request is processed without a 401 or 403 response.Affected if The request completes without authentication and modifies presale counter data in the database
A user is affected if the TokenICO plugin version is 2.4.7 or earlier and the createSaleRecord function is accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the TokenICO plugin to version 2.4.8 or later which implements proper authentication and capability verification on the affected function. Until patched, consider disabling the plugin or restricting access via web server-level controls.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11771 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11771 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data