CVE-2025-11942
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in 70mai X200 up to 20251010. Affected is an unknown function of the component Pairing. Executing manipulation can lead to missing authentication. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe 70mai X200 dashcam contains a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in its Pairing component. Attackers can remotely pair with the device without any credentials, gaining full control. The exploit is publicly available and requires no special privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025-10-10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelLocate the device label on the dashcam or check the 70mai app device information to confirm the model is X200Affected if The device is a 70mai X200 dashcam
-
Check the installed firmware versionOpen the 70mai app, go to device settings, and locate the firmware version information. Compare it to the affected version range (<= 2025-10-10)Affected if The firmware version is 2025-10-10 or earlier
-
Verify the pairing feature is exposedCheck if the device has pairing mode enabled or is discoverable on the local network. This can be confirmed through the app settings or by observing network traffic for pairing-related communicationsAffected if Pairing mode is active and the device accepts pairing requests without authentication prompts
-
Assess network exposureReview your router settings to determine if the device is on an isolated VLAN, if UPnP is enabled on the router, or if the device is accessible from external networksAffected if The device is on the same network segment as other devices without isolation, or UPnP is enabled allowing external discovery
-
Check for unauthorized device pairingsReview the connected devices list in the 70mai app to see all paired accounts. Look for unfamiliar or unexpected user accounts or devicesAffected if There are unexpected or unauthorized accounts paired to the device
A user is affected if they have a 70mai X200 dashcam with firmware dated 2025-10-10 or earlier, and the pairing component is accessible on their network without additional access controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond, apply compensating controls: isolate the device on a restricted network segment, disable UPnP on routers, monitor for unauthorized connections, and contact 70mai directly requesting a firmware patch.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11942 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11942 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data