Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2025-11949

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EasyFlow .NET and EasyFlow AiNet, developed by Digiwin, has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain database administrator credentials via a specific functionality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

EasyFlow .NET and EasyFlow AiNet contain a missing authentication vulnerability in a specific functionality that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to directly access sensitive functionality and obtain database administrator credentials. The lack of authentication checks on this endpoint permits complete bypass of access controls, potentially giving attackers full database access.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints, particularly those exposing database credentials. Rotate any exposed database administrator credentials immediately and implement least-privilege access controls for database connections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm EasyFlow product installation
    Identify whether EasyFlow .NET or EasyFlow AiNet is installed in your environment. Check for installation directories, services, or applications named EasyFlow.
    Affected if Either EasyFlow .NET or EasyFlow AiNet is present in the environment
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate the version information for your EasyFlow installation. Check installation folders, configuration files, or the application itself for version metadata. Compare your version against any publicly available version information for EasyFlow .NET and EasyFlow AiNet.
    Affected if Your installed version matches the vulnerable release(s) of EasyFlow .NET or EasyFlow AiNet
  3. Identify sensitive endpoint exposure
    Review web server configuration, reverse proxy settings, or API gateway rules for EasyFlow. Look for endpoints or functionalities that handle database connection strings, database credentials, or administrative database access functions. Check if these endpoints are accessible via HTTP/HTTPS without authentication.
    Affected if A functionality or endpoint exposing database administrator credentials is accessible without requiring authentication
  4. Test unauthenticated access to sensitive functions
    Using a web browser or HTTP tool, attempt to access known or suspected sensitive endpoints within EasyFlow without providing any credentials. Common paths to test include administrative functions, configuration retrieval endpoints, or database connection endpoints. Note whether the server returns sensitive data or allows access.
    Affected if Sensitive functionality that should require authentication returns data or allows access without any credentials being provided

You are affected if EasyFlow .NET or EasyFlow AiNet is running in your environment and a sensitive endpoint exposing database administrator credentials is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication and authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints, particularly those exposing database credentials. Rotate any exposed database administrator credentials immediately and implement least-privilege access controls for database connections.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11949 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data