CVE-2025-11954
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sitemio Information Technologies Trade Ltd. Co. WISECP allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WISECP: through 20022026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WISECP allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended actions. The application lacks proper CSRF tokens or validation (e.g., SameSite cookies, Origin/Referer checks) on state-changing requests, enabling attackers to craft malicious requests that execute in the context of a victim's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WISECP installationIdentify whether WISECP is installed in your environment by checking for WISECP-related directories, services, or web applications running on your servers.Affected if WISECP software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed WISECP versionLocate and read the version file or version indicator within the WISECP installation directory. Common locations include a version.php file, a config file, or the admin dashboard version display.Affected if The installed version is 20022026 or any earlier version (all versions through 20022026 are affected)
-
Inspect form submissions for CSRF tokensExamine the HTML source code or web requests generated by WISECP pages that perform state-changing operations (such as user management, settings changes, or order processing). Check if forms include a hidden CSRF token field or anti-CSRF token parameter.Affected if State-changing forms lack CSRF token fields or tokens are not validated server-side
-
Verify Origin/Referer header validationReview the server-side code or web server configuration to determine if incoming requests are validated against trusted Origin or Referer headers before processing sensitive actions.Affected if The application does not validate Origin or Referer headers for state-changing requests
-
Check SameSite cookie configurationInspect the session or authentication cookies set by WISECP to determine if the SameSite attribute is properly configured (should be set to 'Strict' or 'Lax').Affected if Cookies lack SameSite attribute or it is set to 'None' without Secure flag
Your environment is affected if WISECP is installed with version 20022026 or earlier and state-changing operations lack CSRF token validation or Origin header checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations (forms, AJAX requests) and configure SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attributes for session cookies. Add Origin/Referer header validation as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11954 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data