CVE-2025-11957
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper authorization in the temporary access workflow of Devolutions Server 2025.2.12.0 and earlier allows an authenticated basic user to self-approve or approve the temporary access requests of other users and gain unauthorized access to vaults and entries via crafted API requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper authorization in the temporary access workflow of Devolutions Server allows authenticated basic users to self-approve or approve other users' temporary access requests via crafted API requests, bypassing role-based access controls and gaining unauthorized access to vaults and entries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.2.14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Devolutions Server versionLocate the Devolutions Server installation and check the installed version number. This is typically found in the application itself, installation files, or system information about the installed software.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2025.2.14.0 (for example, 2025.2.12.0 or earlier)
-
Confirm temporary access workflow is enabledCheck the Devolutions Server configuration or settings to determine if the temporary access feature is active. This may be visible in the administrative interface or configuration files.Affected if The temporary access feature is enabled and available for use in the environment
-
Review audit logs for approval actionsExamine the Devolutions Server security or audit logs for events related to temporary access approvals. Look for records of approval actions performed on temporary access requests.Affected if Basic or standard users are shown as having approved temporary access requests (which should require elevated privileges)
-
Inspect for unauthorized vault or entry accessReview access logs or vault entry access records to identify if basic users accessed vaults or entries through temporary access requests they should not have been able to approve.Affected if Basic users accessed sensitive vaults or entries via temporary access that was approved without proper authorization enforcement
You are affected if Devolutions Server version is below 2025.2.14.0 and the temporary access workflow is in use, with evidence of basic users approving access requests they should not have permissions to approve.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.2.14.0
Upgrade Devolutions Server to a version newer than 2025.2.12.0 which contains the vendor patch for proper authorization enforcement in the temporary access workflow.
Devolutions Server 2025.2.14.0
- 1. Back up your current Devolutions Server database and configuration.
- 2. Download Devolutions Server version 2025.2.14.0 or later from the official Devolutions website (devolutions.net).
- 3. Stop the Devolutions Server service before performing the upgrade.
- 4. Run the installer/upgrade package for version 2025.2.14.0.
- 5. Follow the on-screen upgrade instructions, ensuring database migration completes successfully.
- 6. Restart the Devolutions Server service after the upgrade finishes.
- 7. Verify the temporary access workflow now properly enforces authorization checks.
- 8. Confirm that basic users can no longer approve their own or others' temporary access requests through the API.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11957 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11957 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data