CVE-2025-12044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”) are vulnerable to an unauthenticated denial of service when processing JSON payloads. This occurs due to a regression from a previous fix for [+HCSEC-2025-24+|https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2025-24-vault-denial-of-service-though-complex-json-payloads/76393] which allowed for processing JSON payloads before applying rate limits. This vulnerability, CVE-2025-12044, is fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.21.0 and Vault Enterprise 1.16.27, 1.19.11, 1.20.5, and 1.21.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVault and Vault Enterprise contain a regression vulnerability (CVE-2025-12044) where JSON payloads are processed before rate limits are applied, allowing unauthenticated attackers to cause denial of service by sending complex JSON payloads. This is a regression from a previous fix for HCSEC-2025-24.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.16.25, < 1.16.27>= 1.18.14, <= 1.18.15>= 1.19.9, <= 1.19.11>= 1.20.3, < 1.20.5>= 1.20.3, < 1.21.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Vault versionRun 'vault version' command on the Vault server, or check the Vault binary metadataAffected if Version is >= 1.16.25 and < 1.16.27, OR >= 1.18.14 and <= 1.18.15, OR >= 1.19.9 and <= 1.19.11, OR >= 1.20.3 and < 1.20.5, OR >= 1.20.3 and < 1.21.0
-
Confirm Vault API listener is exposedCheck Vault configuration file (usually /etc/vault/config.hcl) for listener section and network exposureAffected if Vault API port (default 8200) is bound to an IP accessible from untrusted networks
-
Verify JSON API endpoint accessibilityIdentify API endpoints that accept JSON payloads (such as /v1/sys/...) and confirm they accept unauthenticated requestsAffected if Unauthenticated JSON-processing endpoints are reachable by attackers
User is affected if Vault version is within any of the affected ranges AND the JSON API endpoints are network-accessible to unauthenticated attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.16.271.20.51.21.0
Upgrade Vault to version 1.21.0 (Community) or Enterprise versions 1.16.27, 1.19.11, 1.20.5, or 1.21.0 to apply the rate limiting fix before JSON processing.
1.16.27, 1.19.11, 1.20.5, or 1.21.0 (recommended: latest stable 1.21.x)
- 1. Identify current Vault version by running `vault version`
- 2. Determine appropriate upgrade target based on current version: if 1.16.x upgrade to 1.16.27; if 1.18.x upgrade to 1.18.16 or later; if 1.19.x upgrade to 1.19.11; if 1.20.x upgrade to 1.20.5; otherwise upgrade to 1.21.0
- 3. Review Vault upgrade documentation at https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/upgrading
- 4. Create a backup of Vault data and configuration using `vault operator snapshot save`
- 5. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 6. Perform the upgrade following standard Vault upgrade procedures
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking `vault version` output
- 8. Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by testing JSON payload processing
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data