CVE-2025-12105
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in the asynchronous message queue handling of the libsoup library, widely used by GNOME and WebKit-based applications to manage HTTP/2 communications. When network operations are aborted at specific timing intervals, an internal message queue item may be freed twice due to missing state synchronization. This leads to a use-after-free memory access, potentially crashing the affected application. Attackers could exploit this behavior remotely by triggering specific HTTP/2 read and cancel sequences, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in libsoup's asynchronous message queue handling for HTTP/2 communications. When network operations are aborted at specific timing intervals, an internal message queue item may be freed twice due to missing state synchronization between queue operations, leading to memory corruption and application crashes via denial-of-service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify libsoup installation and versionRun 'pkg-config --modversion libsoup-3.0' or 'pkg-config --modversion libsoup-2.4' to determine the installed libsoup version. For systems without pkg-config, check package manager output (apt list --installed | grep libsoup, rpm -qa | grep libsoup, etc.)Affected if The installed libsoup version falls within any affected version range and the application uses HTTP/2 connections
-
Confirm HTTP/2 support is enabledInspect the application's libsoup configuration or client creation code. Look for SoupSession or SoupClient usage where HTTP/2 is explicitly enabled via SoupHTTPVersion (e.g., SOUP_HTTP_2_0) or via configuration options. Check configuration files for enable-http2=true or similar settings.Affected if HTTP/2 support is enabled in the libsoup configuration being used by the application
-
Identify applications using libsoup for network operationsReview application dependencies to confirm linkage with libsoup. For web servers or proxies using libsoup (such as GNOME's gwiberd or custom applications), examine running processes and their runtime behavior. Use 'ldd <binary>' to check for libsoup linkage.Affected if An application linked against libsoup is handling HTTP/2 network traffic that could be aborted
-
Monitor for crash patterns consistent with double-freeReview system crash logs, application logs, and core dumps for patterns indicating memory corruption or double-free errors in libsoup network handling code. Look for log entries mentioning 'libsoup', 'HTTP/2', 'queue', or memory corruption errors occurring during network abort scenarios.Affected if Crash logs or memory dumps show use-after-free or double-free behavior in libsoup's message queue handling during network operations
A user is affected if their system has a vulnerable libsoup version with HTTP/2 support enabled and applications handling HTTP/2 connections that could experience network abort conditions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for libsoup when released; until then, restrict or monitor HTTP/2 connections from untrusted sources to reduce attack surface.
Upgrade libsoup to the version containing the CVE-2025-12105 fix; check Red Hat or GNOME project security advisories for the specific fixed version number
- Check your distribution's package manager for available libsoup updates (e.g., apt update && apt-cache policy libsoup2.4-1 on Debian/Ubuntu, dnf check-update on Fedora/RHEL, or pacman -Sy on Arch)
- Upgrade libsoup to the latest available version in your distribution's repositories
- Restart any GNOME or WebKit-based applications (such as epiphany, geary, or WebKitGTK applications) to ensure they load the updated library
- Verify the fix by checking the libsoup version matches the patched release (consult your vendor's security advisory for the exact version number)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12105 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data