Out-of-bounds ReadWeakness · CWE-125

CVE-2025-12183

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-11-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
97/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Out-of-bounds memory operations in lz4-java versions 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input. This is a memory safety vulnerability in the compression library where malformed compressed data can trigger reads beyond buffer boundaries.

MitigationUpgrade lz4-java to the latest patched version (1.8.1 or later) and validate that all compression/decompression functionality continues to work correctly after the upgrade.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Find lz4-java library in your project
    Search your project dependencies for lz4-java (also known as net.jpountz.lz4:lz4-java) by checking your Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or inspecting the JAR files in your classpath
    Affected if lz4-java is present in your dependencies or classpath
  2. Determine the exact version installed
    Locate the lz4-java JAR file or dependency declaration and note the version number (for example, look for lz4-java-1.8.0.jar or in your dependency management)
    Affected if The version is 1.8.0 or any version earlier than 1.8.0
  3. Check if your application processes compressed input
    Review your code to determine whether lz4-java is used to decompress data that comes from untrusted or external sources, such as user uploads, network streams, or files handled by your application
    Affected if Your application decompresses data using lz4-java from untrusted or external sources (this is the attack vector for the vulnerability)

You are affected if lz4-java version 1.8.0 or earlier is present in your environment AND your application uses it to decompress untrusted compressed input, because the out-of-bounds memory read requires the vulnerable code path to be invoked with malformed data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade lz4-java to the latest patched version (1.8.1 or later) and validate that all compression/decompression functionality continues to work correctly after the upgrade.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

org.lz4:lz4-java version 1.8.1 or later

  1. 1. Identify all Maven/Gradle dependencies that reference org.lz4:lz4-java in your project
  2. 2. Run a dependency tree command (e.g., mvn dependency:tree or gradle dependencies) to confirm the current version in use
  3. 3. Update the dependency version to 1.8.1 or later in your build configuration (pom.xml or build.gradle)
  4. 4. Rebuild and test your application to verify the library upgrade does not cause regressions
  5. 5. Verify the fix is applied by checking that the lz4-java version resolves to 1.8.1 or higher
Caveat Minor version upgrade within the 1.x line; low risk of breaking changes expected, but regression testing is recommended

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12183 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12183 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data