InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2025-12248

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in CLTPHP 3.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /home/search.html. Such manipulation of the argument keyword leads to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in CLTPHP 3.0's /home/search.html file allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the 'keyword' parameter. The application fails to properly sanitize user input before using it in database queries, enabling attackers to manipulate query logic, extract data, or potentially execute commands.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements to ensure the 'keyword' parameter is treated as literal data rather than executable code. Validate and sanitize all user inputs before database operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm CLTPHP installation
    Locate CLTPHP by checking for characteristic files such as index.php, config.php, or a /home/ directory in the web root. Common paths: /var/www/html/, /wwwroot/, or the web server document root.
    Affected if CLTPHP is present in the environment
  2. Identify installed CLTPHP version
    Open the main index.php or a version/config file in the CLTPHP installation directory. Look for a version variable or release notes file that states the version number.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.0 or falls within the 3.x branch
  3. Verify vulnerable file exists
    Check for the presence of /home/search.html in the CLTPHP web root. This file handles the search functionality.
    Affected if The file /home/search.html exists and is accessible via the web server
  4. Confirm search feature uses keyword parameter
    Access the search functionality via browser or curl: /home/search.html?keyword=test or /index.php/home/search/index?keyword=test. Inspect the HTTP request and response.
    Affected if The search page accepts the 'keyword' parameter and returns results without immediate error
  5. Check for SQL injection vulnerability in keyword parameter
    Submit a test payload in the keyword parameter such as a single quote (') or a sleep-based payload (e.g., keyword=test' AND SLEEP(5)--). Observe database response time or error messages.
    Affected if The application returns a database error or exhibits delayed response indicating unsanitized input is used in SQL queries

If CLTPHP 3.0 is installed, the /home/search.html file exists, and the search feature processes the 'keyword' parameter without sanitization, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements to ensure the 'keyword' parameter is treated as literal data rather than executable code. Validate and sanitize all user inputs before database operations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12248 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12248 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data