CVE-2025-12266
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in Zytec Dalian Zhuoyun Technology Central Authentication Service up to 20251009. This vulnerability affects the function _empty of the file /index.php/auth/widget. Performing manipulation of the argument get.layer/get.widget/get.action results in code injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCode injection vulnerability in Zytec Dalian Zhuoyun Technology Central Authentication Service allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary code via the _empty magic method in /index.php/auth/widget by manipulating GET parameters (get.layer, get.widget, get.action). The _empty method is called when accessing undefined methods, and improper input handling allows injection of malicious code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application is Zytec Dalian Zhuoyun Central Authentication ServiceCheck the web application banner, headers, or source code for references to Zytec, Dalian Zhuoyun, or Central Authentication Service. Look for /index.php/auth/widget endpoint in the application structure.Affected if The application is the Zytec Dalian Zhuoyun Technology Central Authentication Service
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint existsCheck if the path /index.php/auth/widget is accessible on the web server. This is the specific endpoint where the _empty magic method can be triggered.Affected if The /index.php/auth/widget endpoint exists and responds to requests
-
Confirm GET parameters are processed without sanitizationTest if the application accepts get.layer, get.widget, or get.action parameters on the /index.php/auth/widget endpoint. These parameters trigger the _empty method when non-existent method names are passed.Affected if The application accepts layer, widget, or action GET parameters on this endpoint without strict validation
-
Identify if _empty magic method is implementedLocate and examine the PHP class containing the _empty magic method, typically in the authentication controller. The _empty method is invoked when undefined methods are called.Affected if The _empty magic method exists in the authentication class and processes user-supplied input without proper sanitization
-
Check for indicators of exploitation attemptsReview web server access logs for requests to /index.php/auth/widget with unusual values in layer, widget, or action parameters. Look for patterns suggesting code injection attempts.Affected if Logs show requests with suspicious parameter values that may indicate exploitation attempts
A user is affected if they run the Zytec Dalian Zhuoyun Central Authentication Service with the /index.php/auth/widget endpoint exposed and the _empty magic method handling unsanitized GET parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all GET parameters, particularly layer/widget/action. Consider deploying a WAF rule to block suspicious requests to /index.php/auth/widget until vendor provides official patch. If possible, disable the _empty magic method or refactor the authentication service to use explicit method routing instead of dynamic method calls.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12266 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12266 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data