dbcve.org
Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2025-1229

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in olajowon Loggrove up to e428fac38cc480f011afcb1d8ce6c2bad378ddd6. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /read/?page=1&logfile=eee&match=. The manipulation of the argument path leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Loggrove up to commit e428fac38cc480f011afcb1d8ce6c2bad378ddd6 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the /read/ endpoint. The logfile parameter is not properly sanitized before being passed to a system call, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands.

MitigationSanitize and validate the logfile parameter using allowlist filtering or parameterized methods. Replace any unsafe command execution with parameterized queries or input validation libraries. Consider implementing Web Application Firewall rules as a temporary mitigation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Loggrove version
    Run 'git log -1 --format=%H' in the Loggrove installation directory to retrieve the current commit hash, or check the git repository for the installed version
    Affected if The commit hash is e428fac38cc480f011afcb1d8ce6c2bad378ddd6 or earlier (more recent than or equal to this commit)
  2. Locate the /read/ endpoint handler
    Search the codebase for route definitions containing '/read/' or '@app.route("/read")' to find the endpoint implementation file
    Affected if The /read/ endpoint exists in the codebase and is registered as a route
  3. Inspect the logfile parameter handling
    Examine the code in the /read/ endpoint handler and look for how the 'logfile' parameter is retrieved (e.g., request.args.get('logfile') or request.form.get('logfile'))
    Affected if The logfile parameter is obtained from user input (GET or POST request parameters)
  4. Check for unsafe system call usage
    Search the /read/ endpoint code for system call functions such as os.system(), subprocess.call(), subprocess.run(), or os.popen() that use the logfile parameter directly
    Affected if The logfile parameter is passed directly to a system call without sanitization or validation
  5. Verify the vulnerable code path is reachable
    Confirm the /read/ endpoint is exposed in the running application (check if the route is registered and the application server is running) and that network access is permitted
    Affected if The /read/ endpoint is accessible to network users and accepts requests with the logfile parameter

A user is affected if their Loggrove installation is at commit e428fac38cc480f011afcb1d8ce6c2bad378ddd6 or earlier and the /read/ endpoint with an unsanitized logfile parameter is exposed and reachable.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Sanitize and validate the logfile parameter using allowlist filtering or parameterized methods. Replace any unsafe command execution with parameterized queries or input validation libraries. Consider implementing Web Application Firewall rules as a temporary mitigation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1229 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1229 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data